
Xiaomi's Dual Play: Auto Expansion Meets National Subsidies—Is the Tech Giant Primed for a Windfall

Xiaomi Group (1810.HK) released its Q1 2025 financial report (as of March 2025) after the Hong Kong market closed on May 27, 2025, Beijing time. Key highlights:
1. Overall Performance: Revenue of 111.3 billion yuan, up 47% YoY, with the better-than-expected growth primarily driven by IoT. Gross margin was the standout this quarter, with IoT and automotive gross margins reaching 25% and 23%, respectively.
2. Smartphones: 50.6 billion yuan, below market expectations of 51.3 billion yuan, with overseas markets dragging. Driven by domestic subsidies, $XIAOMI-W(01810.HK) saw domestic smartphone sales grow 40% YoY, but "weakness" overseas limited global sales growth to just 3%.
3. IoT: 32.3 billion yuan, significantly boosted by domestic subsidies, with growth hitting 50% for two consecutive quarters. As Xiaomi's IoT product lineup—including home appliances, wearables, and tablets—benefits from subsidies, the segment continues to outperform expectations.
4. Internet Services: 9.1 billion yuan, in line with expectations. Growth was mainly driven by advertising, while value-added services stagnated. User growth for MIUI rose 9% YoY, but ARPU increased only 3%.
5. Automotive: Q1 auto-related income totaled 18.6 billion yuan, meeting expectations. Deliveries reached 76,000 units, with an ASP of 239,000 yuan. Automotive gross margin improved to 23.2%, well above the expected 20.8%. With margin expansion, the segment’s operating loss narrowed to 500 million yuan.
6. Profit: Core profit of 10 billion yuan, with adjusted net profit at 10.9 billion. Driven by revenue growth, margin expansion, and lower expense ratios, core profit doubled YoY.
Dolphin Research’s View: Xiaomi delivers strong results again; focus shifts to subsidy sustainability and YU7’s performance.
Xiaomi’s IoT segment, buoyed by subsidies, extended its strong performance from last quarter, becoming the primary driver of revenue outperformance.
Beyond revenue, the quarter’s biggest surprise was gross margin expansion, led by IoT and automotive. IoT margin gains stemmed from subsidies, while auto margins benefited from higher capacity utilization at Plant 1 and rising vehicle ASPs.
Key operational focus areas:
1. Automotive: Monthly deliveries averaged 25,300 in Q1, already 200% of Plant 1’s designed annual capacity (150,000 units).
Given current sales, the full-year target of 350,000 units may be conservative. Jan-Apr deliveries hit 104,400, with monthly sales stabilizing at ~29,000. At this pace, Plant 1 alone could deliver 336,000 units annually. With Plant 2 starting production in H2, exceeding 350,000 is likely—Xiaomi may revise its target to 400,000.
2. Traditional Hardware: IoT’s outperformance was subsidy-driven. Smartphone revenue growth slowed, with domestic sales up 40% but overseas declining sharply. Overall smartphone demand remains subdued; hardware growth hinges on subsidy continuity.
For valuation, Xiaomi’s traditional and auto businesses are assessed separately. Assuming a 20-25x PE on 2025 core operating profit (+36% revenue, +2.4ppt margins, 15% tax rate), the traditional business could be worth 800-1000 billion yuan, with the rest attributed to auto segment. Xiaomi Auto’s 2025 revenue may approach 100 billion yuan, but supply constraints justify a premium PS multiple. Once order backlogs shrink from 10 months to 3-5 weeks, peer valuations will become more relevant.
Current bullish narratives—"subsidy-driven growth" and "overflowing auto orders"—remain intact, with earnings confirming Xiaomi’s cyclical strength. Longer term, subsidy sustainability and YU7’s success (as a potential million-unit/year product) will be critical. Monitor order trends and delivery cycles for updates. For more, see Dolphin Research’s upcoming management meeting notes.
Dolphin Research’s detailed analysis:
I. Overview: Subsidies Fuel IoT, Auto Hits Full Throttle
Xiaomi now reports "Smartphone x AIoT" and "Auto & Innovation" segments, reflecting its automotive focus. The latter’s standalone disclosure underscores its strategic importance—and the trillion-yuan market cap hinges on auto’s realization.
1.1 Revenue
Q1 revenue rose 47.3% YoY to 111.3 billion yuan (vs. 109.0 billion expected), led by IoT and autos. IoT drove the beat.
1) Legacy business (Smartphone x AIoT): 92.7 billion yuan (+22.8% YoY), powered by IoT (+58.7%). Smartphones and internet services grew ~10%.
2) Auto & Innovation: 18.6 billion yuan, matching SU7 delivery estimates.
1.2 Margins
Gross margin hit 22.8% (vs. 21.4% expected), lifted by IoT and autos.
a) Legacy margin: 22.8%. Appliances, tablets, and wearables benefited from subsidies; smartphones were flat. Subsidy impacts vary by product.
Other legacy businesses posted a 340 million yuan gross loss (e.g., AC installation services). Adjusting for this, IoT margin would be below the reported 25.2%.
Smartphone margins fell to 12.4% due to higher component costs, but legacy margins still came in ahead thanks to IoT.
b) Auto margin: 23.2% (vs. 20.8% expected).
After Q4 2024 deliveries of 23,000+ (20.4% margin), Plant 1’s utilization hit ~200% of its 150,000-unit annual capacity. The margin beat also reflected the February launch of SU7 Ultra.
With output stabilizing at ~29,000/month in Mar-Apr, Q2 auto margins may rise further.
Auto margins now exceed legacy business. Scaling production may push auto margins higher, potentially turning profitable sooner.
II. Autos: 350K Target Too Low? Aim for 400K
Auto revenue (18.1 billion yuan) and peripherals (18.6 billion total) met expectations.
Deliveries: 76,000 (known), ASP: 238,000 yuan (+2% QoQ). SU7 Ultra’s February launch lifted ASPs.
Q1 margin: 23.2% (see above). Short-term elasticity depends on product mix. SU7 Ultra shares production lines with SU7; Plant 1’s max output is ~360,000 units annually. With orders exceeding supply, ASPs reflect backlog-driven allocation.
The 350,000 full-year target seems low—Jan-Apr deliveries hit 104,400 (~29,000/month). At this pace, Plant 1 alone could deliver 336,000. With Plant 2 starting in H2, 400,000 is achievable.
Last week’s YU7 preview (Xiaomi (Minutes): Can "National Icon" YU7 Challenge Model Y?) positioned it as a Tesla Model Y rival in the 250,000-350,000 yuan SUV segment.
With backlogs (~200,000 orders) far exceeding monthly output (29,000), H1 auto performance hinges on ASPs/margins. H2’s YU7 and Plant 2 could drive further upside.
Current 10-month delivery waits (vs. peers’ 3-5 weeks) justify Xiaomi Auto’s premium PS multiple. Focus now to orders and new launches.
III. Smartphones: Domestic Strength Can’t Offset Overseas Weakness
Q1 smartphone revenue: 50.6 billion yuan (+8.9% YoY). Despite subsidies, growth slowed due to overseas declines.
Dolphin Research’s breakdown:
Volume: 41.8 million units (+3% YoY).
Domestic shipments surged 40% (subsidy-driven), lifting market share to a record 18.6%. But overseas shipments fell 8.9%, with India down 38%.
ASP: 1,211 yuan (+10.5% YoY).
Higher domestic mix stabilized ASPs above 1,200 yuan. Domestic shipments now exceed 30% of total.
Smartphone gross profit fell 8.7% YoY to 6.3 billion yuan, pressured by memory cost hikes. Q1 margin edged up 0.4ppt QoQ to 12.4% on higher domestic mix.
The self-developed 3nm Xuanjie O1 chip (debuting in 15S Pro) signals Xiaomi’s tech ambitions but won’t immediately improve margins due to high costs.
IV. IoT: Subsidy Tailwinds Continue
Q1 IoT revenue: 32.3 billion yuan (+58.7% YoY). Tablets (+40% QoQ), appliances, and wearables all benefited from subsidies.
IoT gross profit doubled YoY to 8.15 billion yuan, with margin up 5.3ppt to 25.2%. High-margin appliances (+113% YoY) drove the mix.
With subsidies likely persisting, IoT growth may sustain 50%+ in Q2-Q3.
V. Internet Services: Ads Still Lead
Q1 internet revenue: 9.1 billion yuan (+12.8% YoY). Growth slowed, led by ads:
1) Ads: 6.6 billion yuan (+20% YoY). Overseas growth continued despite India weakness; domestic ads improved.
Xiaomi’s ad dominance in app distribution/pre-installs—a "tax" for developers—ties closely to device sales.
2) Value-added: Gaming, e-commerce (Youpin), and fintech flat at 2.5 billion yuan. Stagnant.
As a "legacy" segment, internet services now trail auto in margins.
VI. Overseas: Hardware Stalls
Q1 overseas revenue: 38.2 billion yuan (+0.9% YoY). With domestic focus, overseas now ~1/3 of total.
Internet revenue grew 8.2% to 2.71 billion yuan, but hardware stagnated.
Overseas smartphone shipments fell 8.9%, with flat hardware revenue likely due to IoT offsets.
VII. Expenses: Ratio Declines
Q1 opex: 15.4 billion yuan (ratio down 1.4ppt QoQ). Autos contributed 4.8 billion yuan.
Sales/marketing fell 500 million yuan on reduced promotions. G&A held steady; R&D stayed at 6.7 billion yuan despite YU7/O1 chip launches.
Core operating profit: 10 billion yuan (9% margin), a record high, driven by IoT/auto margins.
Adjusted net profit: 10.7 billion yuan (above core profit). Dolphin Research discounts adjustments (e.g., investment gains) as non-recurring.
<End>
Dolphin Research’s Xiaomi archive:
Earnings Season
May 22, 2025 YU7 Launch: Xiaomi (Minutes): Can "National Icon" YU7 Challenge Model Y?
Mar 18, 2025 Call: Xiaomi (Minutes): Smartphones Target 200M; No Strict Auto Profit Target
Mar 18, 2025 Earnings: Xiaomi: "Best Ever"—But How Good?
Nov 18, 2024 Call: Xiaomi: 20,000 Stores by 2025 (Q3 2024 Call)
Nov 18, 2024 Earnings: Super Xiaomi Rises Again
Aug 21, 2024 Call: Xiaomi: Boosting Auto Competitiveness, Avoiding Price Wars (Q2 2024 Call)
Aug 21, 2024 Earnings: Autos Ignite, Phones Warm—Is Xiaomi Back?
May 23, 2024 Call: Xiaomi: Auto Retail, 20,000 Stores in 3 Years (Q1 2024 Call)
May 23, 2024 Earnings: Xiaomi: Phones Recover, Autos Boom—Redemption?
Mar 19, 2024 Call: Xiaomi: Aiming for Top 5 Global Auto Brands (Q4 2023 Call)
Mar 19, 2024 Earnings: "Mediocre" Xiaomi: Only Autos Can Save It
Nov 20, 2023 Call: Xiaomi Management on Margin Drivers (Q3 2023 Call)
Nov 20, 2023 Earnings: Xiaomi Fights Back
Aug 29, 2023 Call: Inventory Normalized, Write-Backs Boost Profit (Q2 2023 Call)
Aug 29, 2023 Earnings: India Woes, Huawei Rises—Can Xiaomi Recover?
May 25, 2023 Call: Chip Investment: A Long-Term Must (Q1 2023 Call)
May 24, 2023 Earnings: Inventory Down, Share Lost—What’s Next?
Mar 25, 2023 Call: Inventory Improves, Demand Still Distant (Q4 2022 Call)
Mar 24, 2023 Earnings: Xiaomi: At Rock Bottom—When to Rise?
Nov 23, 2022 Call: Inventory Digesting, Supply-Demand Balancing (Q3 2022 Call)
Nov 23, 2022 Earnings: Xiaomi Down Too Long—Light Ahead?
Aug 19, 2022 Call: Management Explains Across-the-Board Weakness (Q2 2022 Call)
Aug 19, 2022 Earnings: Layoffs Can’t Fix Xiaomi’s Woes
May 19, 2022 Call: Xiaomi in Crisis: What’s Management Saying? (Q1 2022 Call)
May 19, 2022 Earnings: Troubles at Home and Abroad—Is Xiaomi the Right Pick?
Mar 22, 2022 Call: Xiaomi: Management on a Dull Quarter (Call Minutes)
Mar 22, 2022 Earnings: Average Xiaomi: Neither Here Nor There
Nov 30, 2021 Call: With EVs Launched Back-to-Back, How Can Li Compete? (Minutes)
Nov 23, 2021 Call: Chip Shortages Hit Phones? Xiaomi Management Explains (Call)
Nov 23, 2021 Earnings: Xiaomi’s Rollercoaster: Back to Square One?
Aug 26, 2021 Call: Xiaomi: What Management Said After Stellar Earnings
Aug 25, 2021 Earnings: Stop Doubting—Xiaomi’s Back on Top
May 26, 2021 Earnings: Xiaomi’s Stellar Run: Davis Double in Play?
Mar 25, 2021 Call: Chip Shortages, Slow Internet/IoT, EVs? Xiaomi Answers!
Mar 24, 2021 Earnings: Xiaomi’s Huge Mispricing—What’s Really Going On?
Deep Dives
Dec 7, 2023: Consumer Electronics "Climbing Out": Xiaomi Recovers, Apple Holds
Dec 1, 2022: Xiaomi: Three Arrows for a Turnaround
Jun 17, 2022: Consumer Electronics "Overripe": Apple Holds, Xiaomi Suffers
Dec 1, 2021: Honor Attacks, Xiaomi Faces Another "Life-or-Death" Crisis
Nov 24, 2021: Behind Xiaomi’s Plunge—What Went Wrong?
Jun 11, 2021: 2021: Xiaomi "Reborn" | Dolphin Research
Mar 16, 2021: Dolphin Research | Xiaomi’s Fortunes Turn—Finally?
Disclosures: Dolphin Research Disclaimer
The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.