
The two products from the past couple of days have put me in deep thought.
1. Google Gemini 3.6 Flash: When I read the news about its launch, I was still lying in bed, and I felt absolutely no excitement like when the other two (OpenAI/Anthropic) launched new models, because it was just a version bump +0.1 and still the Flash version. Later, after seeing its model performance benchmarks, it felt like this couldn't even be called the launch of a new model; it's just fine-tuning and improvement.2. Galaxy Z Fold 8: I'm referring to the shorter, stubbier version without the Ultra. It's neither here nor there; who would buy that? It's inconvenient for typing, and the screen isn't as big as a tablet for watching movies.But yesterday during the day, while I was going about my usual work, I gradually realized that I might not have understood Gemini's development direction. Although I pay $200 a month for subscriptions to ChatGPT and Claude, Cursor has a standard paid subscription, and Grok comes with usage credits via Twitter (X) Premium+. Yet, I usually delegate tedious and simple Q&A tasks to Gemini. Not because it's the strongest—it clearly isn't—but because its speed is incredibly fast, and its spoken expression is relatively natural. Sometimes when I ask it to output a deep research report, its expression ability and report layout are the most readable for me.If Google deeply understands user habits like mine, they might carve out a different path, focusing on fast response times and deep integration with their own services. Competing on scale-up might be secondary.Whether it's a personal account or a corporate account, I use Google services.So, an AI that reacts quickly and is deeply integrated into Google's ecosystem can firmly lock in users like me without needing the absolute top-tier reasoning intelligence. This is the path Google should take based on its home-field advantages. They may still do scale-up, but it's not the most urgent priority.I saw the Galaxy Z Fold 8 product early this morning. Although I didn't feel much at first glance, even thinking it was a bit ordinary.But while having breakfast, I couldn't help but think about this short, stubby little toy. The aspect ratio grows on you the more you look at it. I even started wondering if it's worth keeping a Galaxy Z Fold 8 in my bag alongside an S Ultra phone used as a daily driver and camera. If I confirm I don't need to take photos, I'll hold the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as my main device. Only when my schedule requires photography or making traditional phone calls will I take out the traditional S Ultra phone from my bag.The unique screen aspect ratio has actually become a reason for me to consider buying it for daily use. Perhaps, many times we just need manufacturers to define "usage habits".The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.
