If Trump really wants the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, he should collapse employment!

As the market speculates on the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut path, analyses from top investment banks and Federal Reserve officials point to an increasingly clear conclusion: to truly pull the trigger on interest rate cuts, the hesitant Federal Reserve may need to focus less on the subtle fluctuations in inflation data or the short-term noise of tariff policies, and more on a more direct, and possibly harsher signal—the significant deterioration of the labor market.

For those like Trump who desire lower interest rates, a weak job market may be the most effective catalyst to achieve their goals.

Goldman Sachs Perspective: "Significant Upward Pressure" on Unemployment Rate as Action Signal

Goldman Sachs strategist Dominic Wilson explicitly pointed out in his report that the "sharp deterioration" of the labor market is key to a shift in Federal Reserve policy. He emphasized, "Any significant upward pressure on the unemployment rate will see the Federal Reserve firmly turn to action (interest rate cuts)."

Wilson analyzed that although the suspension of mutual tariffs on April 9 briefly halted the economy's slide into recession, the fundamental risks have not been alleviated. The high uncertainty caused by policies, low consumer and business confidence, and the pressure on real income growth mean that the U.S. economy "still has a high likelihood of falling into recession."

Goldman Sachs predicts that if a full-blown recession occurs, the S&P 500 index could drop to around 4,600 points, high-yield bond credit spreads may exceed 600 basis points, and short-term Treasury yields could fall below 3%.

At the same time, recent market volatility (including in the Treasury market) has exposed financial vulnerabilities that remain a hidden risk. The ultimate impact of tariffs on inflation and employment will take time to manifest, which may keep the Federal Reserve in a "recession watch" mode for the next two to three months. The uncertainty surrounding trade and fiscal policy, combined with the need to anchor inflation expectations, makes it difficult for the Federal Reserve to act decisively.

Based on this, Goldman Sachs believes that even if there are short-term disruptions to inflation caused by tariffs, "any significant upward pressure on the unemployment rate will prompt the Federal Reserve to take firm action."

They assess that a recession could "easily" trigger the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by about 200 basis points in the short term, a magnitude "significantly exceeding the market's current pricing." In other words, the upward pressure on the unemployment rate caused by a surge in unemployment numbers may be the key factor forcing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to take action.

Federal Reserve Officials Confirm: Focus on the "Speed of Unemployment Rate Increase"

Recent remarks from Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Christopher Waller provide internal confirmation of the above views. He also views the labor market as a key variable.

Waller acknowledged that the full impact of tariffs may not be clear until the second half of 2025 and tends to believe that its impact is a "one-time price level effect" (i.e., temporary inflation).

He added, "Facing the price increases caused by tariffs and viewing them as a temporary phenomenon requires courage"—this statement hints at the complexity of making such judgments in the current environment, especially considering potential political factors So, what could prompt the Federal Reserve to act quickly? Waller's answer aligns with Goldman Sachs: employment data. He stated that he would "not be surprised" if tariffs lead to more layoffs and a higher unemployment rate. More importantly, Waller emphasized that the Fed's focus will be on the "speed of the rise" in the unemployment rate, rather than its absolute level. He believes:

"Tariffs could quickly drive up the unemployment rate."

This logic is also supported by Minneapolis Fed economist Javier Bianchi, who argues that tariffs are essentially a "negative demand shock" with deflationary effects. This further supports the view that the Fed should "look through" short-term inflation and implement expansionary monetary policy (interest rate cuts) to avoid worse economic consequences.

Waller finally warned that the current reliance on data may put the Fed at risk of "action lag" again (similar to 2021 but in the opposite direction). Once the rise in the unemployment rate drives the economy down, "significant interest rate cuts may follow."